PSN Forum MenuForum NavigationForumActivityLoginRegisterForum breadcrumbs - You are here:ForumExample Category: Autism and Mood ForumForex marketPost ReplyPost Reply: Forex market <blockquote><div class="quotetitle">Quote from Guest on May 13, 2026, 11:38 pm</div>While examining upon the intense economic warfare, sanctions, and global energy crises of the modern era, it is understandable to wonder why enemies would never just strike at the core regarding their opponents' assets. From one strictly vengeful or interruptive viewpoint, one might ask how come Moscow has not attempted so as to kinetically aim at petroleum reserves in the American Nation and elsewhere in these Americas. However, whenever people ground such situation within geopolitical, martial, and economic realities, it becomes evident that holding back from such deeds represents never some mistake or "inane". Rather, this is a fundamental necessity ensuring countrywide survival. Striking sovereign territory in the Americas crosses danger lines that will spark catastrophic worldwide consequences. Below is one detailed breakdown of the reason The Russian Federation will never take armed moves targeting fossil fuel infrastructure within these Americas. https://x.com/indiagreatlol/status/2050986503753351597?s=1 One. The Threat regarding Reciprocally Assured Destruction (MAD) The primary deterrent stopping straight strikes upon this American States mainland remains the doctrine concerning Reciprocally Assured Annihilation. Direct Act constituting Conflict: One kinetic strike on US petroleum zones (such as ones within Texas, AK, and the Gulf of Mexico would be some unjustified act meaning war targeting this US States. Atomic Intensification: This U.S. possesses a single of these most developed plus well-equipped armed forces across the world, alongside one massive nuclear arsenal. An immediate assault on crucial American infrastructure would nearly certainly provoke a devastating traditional retaliation upon Russian territory, carrying some extremely elevated risk regarding growing towards one nuclear exchange. Alliance Article Five: Any assault upon this U.S. or Canada will instantly trigger Clause Five from the NATO pact, pulling the whole of the Western armed alliance inside one direct, total war against Russia. Two. Operational plus Conventional Military Restrictions Although assuming the threat regarding atomic conflict were completely eliminated, Moscow simply misses this conventional armed strength projection ability so as to successfully strike plus heavily harm infrastructure in these American continents. Spatial Truth: These Americas are shielded through a pair of massive oceans. Extending conventional armed force across the Atlantic and Pacific is a logistical feat presently solely manageable through this American States Naval force and its ship strike fleets. Aerial Defenses: To strike U.S. and Canada's petroleum fields, Moscow's planes or sea vessels would have so as to circumvent Aerospace Defense (North America Aerospace Defense HQ) plus this U.S. Fleet. Any arriving aircraft, rockets, and subs will probably get spotted and intercepted long prior to reaching their destinations. Current Commitments: Moscow's conventional military stands heavily pledged to plus strained through its ongoing war in Ukrainian territory. Starting a another battlefield, infinitely highly hard thousands of miles distant, is strategically impossible. 3. The Complicated Network regarding South America's Alliances This prompt mentions other parts of these Americas landmasses. Attacking energy facilities within Central or South Americas makes equally little strategic sense regarding Moscow: Partners and BRICS: Numerous large oil creators within the Americas are either neutral and explicitly amicable toward the Russian Federation. Venezuela is a key Russian partner. The Brazilian nation represents one initial participant of this BRICS financial bloc next to the Russian Federation. Attacking their facilities will mean attacking partners. This Monroe Policy: This USA has historically viewed this Occidental Hemisphere as their zone of control. A Russian armed strike upon a South America's country would probably draw immediate American military involvement, bringing us backward to the threat of a broader worldwide war. 4. Global Financial Suicide Energy markets remain worldwide connected. Assuming Russia were so as to somehow effectively destroy massive amounts of North or Southern American petroleum infrastructure, this financial blowback will heavily harm Russia alone. Economy Crash: Removing millions from barrels of petroleum off this global market overnight would cause fuel costs so as to skyrocket. While Moscow sells petroleum, one shock from such scale would spark a catastrophic worldwide slump. Effect on Customers: Moscow's primary financial lifelines are their shipments to high-demand nations such as China plus the Indian Republic. A worldwide economic collapse triggered through huge energy shortages will destroy these manufacturing plus trade markets of these allies, keeping them unable so as to buy Moscow's products and energy. 5. Unconventional Warfare remains Preferred Since direct kinetic strikes are suicidal, countries like Russia use grey area" and asymmetric combat alternatively. Rather of dropping explosives on petroleum fields, adversaries remain far highly likely so as to use: Hacks: Trying to infiltrate this program that runs pipelines and plants (like as this Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack during 2021, though that was attributed towards illegal groups, not directly this Moscow state). Market Manipulation: Collaborating with OPEC+ so as to cut or increase output to militarize the price regarding oil, instead than destroying the tangible fuel alone. Disinformation: Funding operations so as to delay energy initiatives or sow governmental split within energy-producing countries. Summary In the realm concerning major strategy, destroying some rival's tangible infrastructure on this other side from this world represents one last-resort step regarding complete war. For Moscow, attacking oil zones in the American continents would never obtain any advantage; this would guarantee a devastating military response, alienate crucial political partners, plus risk worldwide atomic annihilation.</blockquote><br> Upload Files:Add another file ...Maximum files: 5 · Maximum file size: 5 MB · Allowed file types: jpg,jpeg,gif,png,bmp,pdfCancel